2/18/2022 0 Comments 5d mark iii vs 6d sensorYou can buy one that fits the hot-shoe but it wont help with the camera at eye-level. If you shoot action this makes a difference, not a huge one but it helps. Negligible for viewing and no effect on photography. In either case, you cannot see what ends up in your images before you shoot and may have to crop later. For high-speed photography such as water-drops, people user flash instead. If you shoot race-cars for example, this could help. It's only one stop and would make a difference in limited circumstances. 1/8000s max shutter-speed for the 5D Mark II versus 1/4000s.If you shoot anywhere need low-light, this alone justifies the 6D. While we do not know yet how the 6D performs, I would expect at least 1 stop, if not 2, of improvement in terms of image-noise. 1 MP difference, that is 5% more pixels for the 5D Mark II and is negligible.The more similar they are, the easier it is, so in this case you are choosing between two full-frame DSLRs with Canon EF-mount. To decide between any cameras, you have to go over the differences and give them value according to your needs. Other answers have already listed them thoroughly, so I will simply refer you to the specification comparison between the Canon EOS 6D and 5D Mark II. In general it's a newer model and whilst it is based around a 40D/50D type chassis it equals or exceeds the 5D mkII in most areas, the only reason I see to go with a 5D mkII would be cost/availability or if you strongly prefer the ergonomics of a larger body or if you wanted to shoot a lot of video with magic lantern.įinding the differences is easy. Results aren't out yet but I would imagine the 6D performs slightly better with regards to low light noise. The resolution difference of both cameras is negligible.
0 Comments
|
AuthorKen ArchivesCategories |